|
In
February 1945 an ad hoc report, compiled by the Swiss
Foreign Affairs Department, confirmed that exhaustion
had been the cause of the three deaths on Mt.Gridone.
But the Swiss version of what had happened and testimony
of the Allied survivors were at odds. This lead to a
brief diplomatic row between the British legation (acting
on behalf of Clarke) and the Swiss government.
Why
did a South African and two American servicemen perish,
inexplicably, on neutral territory? To begin with, it
struck Brig. Cartwright that the Swiss authorities were
strangely tardy – if not downright reluctant – in conducting
the necessary inquest. Or, if there had been one, why
was a courtesy copy of the investigation not forwarded
promptly to the diplomatic mission?
Brig. Cartwright begins investigation
|
|
|
|
|
Henry
Cartwright [Swiss. Fed. Archives}
|
Brig.
Cartwright learnt about the American loss
of lives from his colleagues at the US legation
further along the Thunstrasse. Now the mystified
attaché was impatient to learn from the
Swiss how or why the three Allied men had
died.
Unwilling to be kept waiting
by the host country's complacent authorities,
the suspicious brigadier embarked on an
investigation of his own. He had, at first,
no access to his prime witness, Rfm. J.F.
Welsh. The lone South African, who was recovering
in a Bellinzona hospital from nothing more
serious than frostbite in both feet after
his ordeal, was being held incommunicado
for a fortnight under the évadé quarantine
regulation by the army's Territorial Service
(responsible for the border areas).
Brig.
Cartwright snapped into action as soon as
the Territorial Service released Welsh into
his care on 3 February. He ushered the seven
Commonwealth survivors into his office and
listened, with growing dismay, to their
narrations. On 5 February he got the leaders
of the three escape groups – Rfm. J.F. Welsh,
Cpl. J.W. Rowe, and Pte. W. Frost – to sign
typewritten statements summarizing their
individual experiences. The statements were
necessarily brief and devoid of accusations,
as Brig. Cartwright did not wish to pre-empt
the expected official Swiss investigation
into the tragedy. He trusted the depositions
would serve as a basis for further, more
probing questioning by the Swiss authorities.
The other four men were asked to sign brief
corroborating declarations.[4]
|
Military
attaché
determines deaths are attributed to criminal
negligence by Swiss border guards
|
|
Since
there was no earthly reason to doubt the
survivors' stories or the veracity of the
seven statements and supporting declarations,
the military attaché was convinced he had
watertight evidence to show that the murky
business on the mountain which had ended
in three Allied deaths could be ascribed
to the criminal negligence of two Swiss
border guards who had patrolled the area
in question on 20 January.
Brig.
Cartwright cabled his findings to the War
Office in London on 7 February. He explained
that the escape party had had a hard climb,
with little food, in abnormally cold weather,
over mountainous country covered in fairly
deep snow. He wrote how the men had already
been well within Switzerland when they were
halted by two Swiss soldiers who, instead
of taking them to the nearest and most accessible
control post, ordered them to return up
the mountain in the direction in which they
had just come. "It must have been quite
evident that some of the party were unfit
to make the ascent," Cartwright asserted,
adding that the soldiers were never seen
again by any member of the party, nor did
any rescue party appear. He told the War
Office:
In
my opinion the statements of
the British soldiers and the
American sergeant show a prima
facie case of criminal negligence
against the two Swiss soldiers
mentioned therein, or their
superiors, and I have reported
all the circumstances to His
Majesty's Minister in order
that he may discuss them with
the US Chargé d'Affaires, with
a view to taking the matter
up with the Swiss Political
Department.[5]
|
Brig.
Cartwright also advised the War Office that
he was detaining the seven men in Switzerland
until the matter was cleared up, "in
case are required to give evidence before
a Swiss court."[6] Under international
law the ex-POWs should have quit neutral
territory forthwith, since in 1945 there
were no obstacles to their immediate departure
(the French border in the west was wide
open).(Continued)
|
|